JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanfilippo, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, K. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sanfilippo, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Moss, K. M.

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Vol 82, Issue 10 507-513, Copyright © 1992 by American Podiatric Medical Association

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Dynamic plantar pressure analysis. Comparing common insole materials

PB Sanfilippo, RM Stess and KM Moss
Podiatry Section, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, CA.

A comparison of five commonly used insole materials (Spenco, PPT, Plastazote, Nickelplast, and Pelite) was made to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing plantar vertical pressures on human subjects during walking. With the use of the EMED-SF pedograph force plate system, dynamic measures of vertical force, force-time integral, peak plantar pressure, pressure-time integral, and area of foot-to-ground contact were compared with the force plate covered with each of the insole materials and without any interface material.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JAMAHome page
M. H. Winemiller, R. G. Billow, E. R. Laskowski, and W. S. Harmsen
Effect of Magnetic vs Sham-Magnetic Insoles on Plantar Heel Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, September 17, 2003; 290(11): 1474 - 1478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1992 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.