| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Vol 86, Issue 5 224-227, Copyright © 1996 by American Podiatric Medical Association
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
DG Armstrong, TA Perales, RT Murff, GW Edelson and JG Welchon
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Texas Health Sciences Center, San Antonio 78274-7776, USA.
The authors reviewed the admission leukocyte indices of 338 consecutive admissions (203 males, 135 females, mean age of 60.2 +/- 12.9 years) with a primary diagnosis of diabetic foot infection in a multicenter retrospective study. The mean white blood cell count on admission for all subjects studied was calculated at 11.9 +/- 5.4 x 103 cells/mm3. Of all white blood cell counts secured for patients admitted with a diabetic foot infection, 56% (189 out of 338) were within normal limits. The average automated polymorphonuclear leukocyte percentage was calculated at 71.4 +/- 11.1% (normal range 40% to 80%). Normal polymorphonuclear leukocyte values were present in 83.7% of subjects. The authors stress that the diagnosis of a diabetic pedal infection is made primarily on the basis of clinical signs and symptoms, and that a normal white cell count and white cell differential should not deter the physician from taking appropriate action to mitigate the propagation of a potentially limb-threatening pedal infection.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. A. Lavery, D. G. Armstrong, E. J.G. Peters, and B. A. Lipsky Probe-to-Bone Test for Diagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis: Reliable or relic? Diabetes Care, February 1, 2007; 30(2): 270 - 274. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Lavery, D. G. Armstrong, R. P. Wunderlich, M. J. Mohler, C. S. Wendel, and B. A. Lipsky Risk Factors for Foot Infections in Individuals With Diabetes. Diabetes Care, June 1, 2006; 29(6): 1288 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Kanuck, T. Zgonis, and G. P. Jolly Necrotizing Fasciitis in a Patient with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, January 1, 2006; 96(1): 67 - 72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |