| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Vol 88, Issue 8 381-386, Copyright © 1998 by American Podiatric Medical Association
JOURNAL ARTICLE |
S Weiner-Ogilvie and K Rome
Physiotherapy Department, School of Health, University of Teesside, England, United Kingdom.
The reliability of three commonly used techniques for measuring foot position--valgus index, navicular height, and arch height--was evaluated in a study involving 20 healthy subjects. The results demonstrated significant differences (P < .05) between two observers for all three techniques, although there were no significant differences between two visits for the same observer (P < .05). Secondary analysis demonstrated that navicular height yielded the highest degree of intraobserver and interobserver agreement. The results suggest that there is a wide variation in foot position in the general population, and that measurement error may result from difficulties in defining foot position, techniques used, and instrumentation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Evans, A. W. Copper, R. W. Scharfbillig, S. D. Scutter, and M. T. Williams Reliability of the Foot Posture Index and Traditional Measures of Foot Position J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, May 1, 2003; 93(3): 203 - 213. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Vinicombe, A. Raspovic, and H. B. Menz Reliability of Navicular Displacement Measurement as a Clinical Indicator of Foot Posture J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, May 1, 2001; 91(5): 262 - 268. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |