JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, K. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bryant, A. R.
Right arrow Articles by Singer, K. P.

Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association, Vol 90, Issue 6 295-299, Copyright © 2000 by American Podiatric Medical Association

JOURNAL ARTICLE

Normal values of plantar pressure measurements determined using the EMED-SF system

AR Bryant, P Tinley and KP Singer
Department of Podiatry, School of Physiotherapy, Curtin University of Technology, Australia.

Plantar pressure-measurement technology is being increasingly used by podiatric physicians and surgeons in both clinical practice and research. The authors present normal reference-range values for peak pressure, mean pressure, and pressure-time integral obtained from 30 healthy subjects using a two-step recording technique and the EMED-SF system, as background for proposed clinical trials. Normative data of this type are essential for clinical practice in the comparison of plantar pressure-measurement values of individual patients with those of normal, asymptomatic feet.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
O. Oladeji, C. Stackhouse, E. Gracely, and M. Orlin
Comparison of the Two-Step and Midgait Methods of Plantar Pressure Measurement in Children
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, July 1, 2008; 98(4): 268 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
A. Martinez-Nova, J. P. Huerta, and R. Sanchez-Rodriguez
Cadence, Age, and Weight as Determinants of Forefoot Plantar Pressures Using the Biofoot In-shoe System
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, July 1, 2008; 98(4): 302 - 310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
M. van der Leeden, M. Steultjens, J. H. M. Dekker, A. P. A. Prins, and J. Dekker
Forefoot joint damage, pain and disability in rheumatoid arthritis patients with foot complaints: the role of plantar pressure and gait characteristics
Rheumatology, April 1, 2006; 45(4): 465 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
N. A. Guldemond, P. Leffers, A. P. Sanders, H. Emmen, N. C. Schaper, and G. H. I. M. Walenkamp
Casting Methods and Plantar Pressure: Effects of Custom-made Foot Orthoses on Dynamic Plantar Pressure Distribution
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, January 1, 2006; 96(1): 9 - 18.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
J. G. Clough
Functional Hallux Limitus and Lesser-Metatarsal Overload
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, November 1, 2005; 95(6): 593 - 601.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.