JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lamm, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hillstrom, H. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lamm, B. M.
Right arrow Articles by Hillstrom, H. J.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association Volume 91 Number 2 63-67 2001
Copyright © 2001 American Podiatric Medical Association

Peg-in-Hole, End-to-End, and V Arthrodesis

A Comparison of Digital Stabilization in Fresh Cadaveric Specimens

Bradley M. Lamm, BS*, Carla E. Ribeiro, BS*, Tracey C. Vlahovic, BS*, Gary R. Bauer, DPM{dagger} and Howard J. Hillstrom, PhD{ddagger}

* Submitted during third year, Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
{dagger} Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.
{ddagger} Director, Gait Study Center, and Associate Professor, Department of Orthopedics and Medicine, Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine, Philadelphia, PA; Visiting Assistant Research Professor, Biomedical Engineering and Science Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA. Mailing address: Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine, Eighth at Race St, Philadelphia, PA 19107.

Abstract

The proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis is frequently performed to correct hammer toe deformities. This study was conducted to compare the inherent stability of the three proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodeses—peg-in-hole, end-to-end, and V constructs—in the sagittal plane by means of load-to-failure testing of 30 fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens fixated with a 0.045 Kirschner wire. The peg-in-hole construct was associated with significantly higher peak loads at failure compared with the other two procedures. Furthermore, the peg-in-hole construct had significantly higher stiffness values as compared with the V procedure. This study thus provides evidence that the peg-in-hole procedure is the most biomechanically stable surgical construct for proximal interphalangeal joint fusions under sagittal plane loading. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 91(2): 63-67, 2001)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
B. M. Lamm, C. E. Ribeiro, T. C. Vlahovic, A. Fiorilli, G. R. Bauer, and H. J. Hillstrom
Lesser Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis: A Retrospective Analysis of the Peg-in-Hole and End-to-End Procedures
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, July 1, 2001; 91(7): 331 - 336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.