This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by LaPointe, S. J. Articles by Hillstrom, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by LaPointe, S. J. Articles by Hillstrom, H.

The Reliability of Clinical and Caliper-Based Calcaneal Bisection Measurements

Stephan J. LaPointe, DPM, PhD^*, Charles Peebles, DPM, Aprajita Nakra, DPM and Howard Hillstrom, PhD^§

^* Research Director, Podiatry Institute, Tucker, GA; Assistant Clinical Professor, University of Vermont College of Medicine, Burlington, VT. Mailing address: 12 High Grove Ct, Burlington, VT 05401.
Faculty member, Podiatry Institute, Tucker, GA; private practice, Fort Walton Beach, FL.
Third-year residency, Emory-Northlake Regional Medical Center, Tucker, GA.
^§ Director, Gait Study Center, Temple University School of Podiatric Medicine, Philadelphia, PA.

Abstract

The measurements of subtalar joint neutral position and hindfoot range of motion have been shown to be unreliable. The first step in making these measurements is to determine the calcaneal bisection. This study examines the reliability of bisecting the calcaneus with digital linear calipers. Five trials on each of six cadavers resulted in a mean absolute angular difference of 0.60° (SD ±1.17°). These results were then compared with results from the typical visual method used clinically. Three raters each performed five trials on six cadavers. Visual bisection was more variable, with a mean absolute error of 3.61° (±3.13°). A mean error of 6° (±1°) is certainly possible when the heel is visually bisected. It was determined that the caliper bisection was a valid technique for bisection of the heel, but that clinical visual bisection was not. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 91(3): 121-126, 2001)