JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moadab, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wadhams, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moadab, A.
Right arrow Articles by Wadhams, P.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association Volume 91 Number 6 288-293 2001
Copyright © 2001 American Podiatric Medical Association

Effectiveness of a Nonrinse, Alcohol-Free Antiseptic Hand Wash

Anoosh Moadab, BS*, Kathryne F. Rupley, BS{dagger} and Peter Wadhams, DPM{ddagger}

* Submitted during fourth year, California College of Podiatric Medicine, San Francisco. Mailing address: 375 Laguna Honda Blvd, Box 27, San Francisco, CA 94116.
{dagger} Submitted during fourth year, California College of Podiatric Medicine, San Francisco.
{ddagger} Diplomate, American Board of Podiatric Surgery; Research Coordinator, Woodward Laboratories, Inc, Los Alamitos, CA.

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficacy of a novel surfactant, allantoin, and benzalkonium chloride hand sanitizer using the US Food and Drug Administration’s method for testing antiseptic hand washes that podiatric physicians and other health-care personnel use. The alcohol-free product, HandClens, was compared with an alcohol-based product, Purell. Independent researchers from the California College of Podiatric Medicine conducted the study using 40 volunteer students from the class of 2001. The results show that HandClens outperformed Purell and met the regulatory requirements for a hand sanitizer. Purell failed as an antimicrobial hand wash and was less effective than a control soap used in the study. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 91(6): 288-293, 2001)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 British Journal of Infection ControlHome page
C.M. Pellowe, R.J. Pratt, H.P. Loveday, P. Harper, N. Robinson, and S.R.L.J. Jones
The epic project. Updating the evidence-base for national evidence-based guidelines for preventing healthcare-associated infections in NHS hospitals in England: a report with recommendations
British Journal of Infection Control, December 1, 2004; 5(6): 10 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.