JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Forg, P.
Right arrow Articles by Green, D. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Forg, P.
Right arrow Articles by Green, D. R.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association Volume 91 Number 8 394-405 2001
Copyright © 2001 American Podiatric Medical Association

Flake-Austin Modification of the STA-Peg Arthroereisis

A Retrospective Study

Patricia Forg, DPM*, Kent Feldman, DPM{dagger}, Edward Flake, DPM{ddagger} and Donald R. Green, DPM§

* Private practice, San Diego, CA.
{dagger} Private practice, San Diego, CA.
{ddagger} Private practice, Pine Top, AZ.
§ Fellow, American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons; Podiatric Residency Director, Scripps Mercy Hospital and Medical Center, San Diego, CA. Mailing address: 770 Washington St, Ste 202, San Diego, CA 92103.

Abstract

The Smith subtalar arthroereisis implant (STA-peg) is used to correct severe collapsing pes valgoplanus in children. Flake and Austin modified the placement of this implant to block the leading wall of the lateral talus. Twenty-one patients with a total of 40 STA-peg procedures were evaluated subjectively and objectively. The average age at the time of surgery was 9.7 years (4 to 16 years). The follow-up period averaged 36 months (12 to 90 months). The subjective, objective, and radiographic results were positive and the complication rate was low. A significant advantage of the Flake-Austin modification of the STA-peg placement in transverse planar dominant foot types is also noted. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 91(8): 394-405, 2001)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.