JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, A.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Redmond, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, A.-M.
Right arrow Articles by Redmond, A. C.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association Volume 92 Number 2 115-122 2002
Copyright © 2002 American Podiatric Medical Association

Integrating Research Into the Clinic

What Evidence Based Practice Means to the Practising Podiatrist

Anne-Maree Keenan, BAppSc, MAppSc* and Anthony C. Redmond, DPodM, MSc{dagger}

* Head of Podiatry, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith DC, New South Wales, Australia.
{dagger} Senior Lecturer and Director, Lower Extremity and Podiatry (LEAP) Research Group, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Reprinted by permission, Australasian Journal of Podiatric Medicine, 1999; Vol 33, No. 3: 77-84

Abstract

This paper is the first in a series of three aimed at introducing clinicians to current concepts in research, and outlining how they may be able to apply these concepts to their own clinical practice. It has become evident in recent years that while many practitioners may not want to become actively involved in the research process, simply keeping abreast of the burgeoning publication base will create new demands on their time, and will often require the acquisition of new skills.

This series introduces the philosophies of integrating what sometimes may appear to be abstract research into the realities of the clinical environment. It will provide practitioners with an accessible summary of the tools required in order to understand the research process. For some, it is hoped this series may provide some impetus for the contemplative practitioner to become a more active participant in the research process. This first paper addresses how the evidence based practice (EBP) revolution can be used to empower the individual practitioner and how good quality evidence can improve the overall clinical decision making process. It also suggests key strategies by which the clinician may try to enhance their clinical decision making process and make research evidence more applicable to their day to day clinical practice. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 92(2): 115-122, 2002)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
K. B. Landorf
Letter to the editor: cimetidine as a first-line therapy for pedal verruca.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, March 1, 2006; 96(2): 184 - 185.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
M. L. Green
A Train-the-Trainer Model for Integrating Evidence-Based Medicine Training into Podiatric Medical Education
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, September 1, 2005; 95(5): 497 - 504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.