JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Redmond, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Landorf, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Redmond, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Landorf, K.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association Volume 92 Number 3 159-169 2002
Copyright © 2002 American Podiatric Medical Association

‘Horses for Courses’: The Differences Between Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches to Research

Anthony C. Redmond, DPodM, MSc*, Anne-Maree Keenan, BAppSc(Pod), MAppSc{dagger} and Karl Landorf, DipAppSc(Pod), GradDipEd{ddagger}

* Senior Lecturer and Director, Lower Extremity and Podiatry (LEAP) Research Group, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith DC, New South Wales, Australia.
{dagger} Head of Podiatry, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
{ddagger} Lecturer, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

Reprinted by permission, Australasian Journal of Podiatric Medicine, 2000; Vol 34, No. 1: 5-14

Abstract

Some clinicians may feel dissociated from, and intimidated by the ever-increasing emphasis on research. However, with an understanding of some of the basic principles and key terms, research can feel less daunting. It is the aim of this article, the second in a series of three focusing on understanding research, to introduce clinicians to the different approaches to research, to improve understanding of what the approaches mean, and to highlight when a particular approach may be appropriate. Furthermore, the article will provide an explanation of some of the common terms used within clinical research. This should aid the clinician in applying good, simple, scientific principles to evaluating clinical research evidence. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 92(3): 159-169, 2002)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
R. G. Smith
A Critical Discussion of the Use of Antiseptics in Acute Traumatic Wounds
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, March 1, 2005; 95(2): 148 - 153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.