JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Redmond, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, A.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Redmond, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Keenan, A.-M.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association Volume 92 Number 5 297-305 2002
Copyright © 2002 American Podiatric Medical Association

Understanding Statistics

Putting P-Values into Perspective

Anthony C. Redmond, DPodM, MSc* and Anne-Maree Keenan, BAppSc(Pod), MAppSc{dagger}

* Senior Lecturer and Director, Lower Extremity and Podiatry (LEAP) Research Group, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith DC, New South Wales, Australia.
{dagger} Head of Podiatry, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

From Australasian Journal of Podiatric Medicine 34(4): 125-131, 2000. Reprinted by permission.

Abstract

Understanding statistics can be one of the more difficult and daunting tasks facing the clinician attempting to understand and use the research literature. While the fundamental aim of including statistics in literature is to justify the conclusions and to enhance the information presented, all too often, statistics serve only to intimidate and alienate clinicians. There are two sources for this barrier to understanding: poor comprehension of statistics by clinicians, and inappropriate presentation of statistics by researchers. In the third of our papers on evidence-based practice and the clinician, some basic principles of statistics are introduced. Aspects such as the concepts of clinical and statistical significance are discussed, and an outline of the appropriate use of specific statistics is provided. The hope is that this will enable the clinician to better judge the applicability of statistical techniques as applied in the published literature. Some of the newer, more ‘clinician friendly’ statistical approaches are also presented. Finally some of the cheats and shortcuts commonly encountered in the presentation of research are discussed, and the methods for dealing with them are outlined. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 92(5): 297-305, 2002)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Postgrad. Med. J.Home page
L Novack, A Jotkowitz, B Knyazer, and V Novack
Evidence-based medicine: assessment of knowledge of basic epidemiological and research methods among medical doctors
Postgrad. Med. J., December 1, 2006; 82(974): 817 - 822.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.