JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noakes, H.
Right arrow Articles by Payne, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Noakes, H.
Right arrow Articles by Payne, C.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume 93 Number 3 185-189 2003
Copyright © 2003 American Podiatric Medical Association

The Reliability of the Manual Supination Resistance Test

Hazel Noakes, BPod* and Craig Payne, DipPod, MPH*

* Department of Podiatry, School of Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Corresponding author: Craig Payne, DipPod, MPH, Department of Podiatry, School of Human Biosciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3086, Australia.

Abstract

Several decisions need to be made when prescribing foot orthoses for abnormal foot pronation. One of these decisions is how much force is needed from orthoses to supinate the foot. The supination resistance test has been described as one technique to help determine the amount of force needed. The aim of this project was to determine the reliability of the manual supination resistance test. Four clinicians of differing levels of experience performed the test on 44 subjects (88 feet) on 2 separate days. The test had good reliability overall, with an intertester intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.89. For the two more experienced clinicians, the intratester intraclass correlation coefficients were good (0.82 and 0.78), but for the two inexperienced clinicians they were poor (0.56 and 0.62). The supination resistance test may be clinically useful in the prescription of foot orthoses, but more work is needed to determine its validity and its relationship to clinical outcomes. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 93(3): 185-189, 2003)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
J. S. Wrobel and D. G. Armstrong
Reliability and Validity of Current Physical Examination Techniques of the Foot and Ankle
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, May 1, 2008; 98(3): 197 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
J. Burns, A.-M. Keenan, and A. Redmond
Foot Type and Overuse Injury in Triathletes
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, May 1, 2005; 95(3): 235 - 241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
C. Payne, M. Oates, and H. Noakes
Static Stance Response to Different Types of Foot Orthoses
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, November 1, 2003; 93(6): 492 - 498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2003 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.