JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pehlivan, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pehlivan, O.
Right arrow Articles by Kaplan, H.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume 94 Number 1 43-46 2004
Copyright © 2004 American Podiatric Medical Association

Proximal Oblique Crescentic Osteotomy in Hallux Valgus

Ozcan Pehlivan, MD *, Ibrahim Akmaz, MD *, Can Solakoglu, MD *, Ahmet Kiral, MD * and Haluk Kaplan, MD *

* Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Gulhane Military Medical Academy, Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.

Corresponding author: Ozcan Pehlivan, MD, Ilyas Bey Caddesi, No. 49/51, D.5, 34310 Yedikule, Istanbul, Turkey.

Abstract

Twenty-six patients with moderate-to-severe hallux valgus deformities were evaluated before and after treatment. All of the patients had incongruent great toe joints. The patients underwent modified proximal crescentic osteotomy, which was termed proximal oblique crescentic osteotomy. The results were evaluated at an average follow-up time of 55 weeks. Objective criteria were hallux valgus angle, intermetatarsal angle, shortening of the first metatarsal, and angulation at the osteotomy site. Clinical evaluation was made according to the rating system of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. The mean correction of the hallux valgus and intermetatarsal angles was 22.1° and 9.9°, respectively. Short-term results indicate that proximal oblique crescentic osteotomy is effective in the treatment of hallux valgus; its advantages over other procedures include its technical ease and low rate of complications. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 94(1): 43-46, 2004)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.