JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Landorf, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, R. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Landorf, K. B.
Right arrow Articles by Herbert, R. D.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume 94 Number 6 542-549 2004
Copyright © 2004 American Podiatric Medical Association

Effectiveness of Different Types of Foot Orthoses for the Treatment of Plantar Fasciitis

Karl B. Landorf, DipAppSc(Pod), GradDipEd *, Anne-Maree Keenan, BAppSc(Pod), MAppSc {dagger} and Robert D. Herbert, PhD {ddagger}

* School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Campbelltown, Australia.
{dagger} Academic Unit of Musculoskeletal Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Leeds, Leeds, England.
{ddagger} School of Physiotherapy, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Corresponding author: Karl B. Landorf, DipAppSc(Pod), GradDipEd, School of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Western Sydney, Bldg 24/Campbelltown Campus, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, New South Wales 1797, Australia.

Abstract

Clinicians often use foot orthoses to manage the symptoms of plantar fasciitis. Although there has been considerable research evaluating the effectiveness of orthoses for this condition, there is still a lack of scientific evidence that is of suitable quality to fully inform clinical practice. Randomized controlled trials are recognized as the "gold standard" when evaluating the effectiveness of treatments. We discuss why randomized controlled trials are so important, the features of a well-conducted randomized controlled trial, and some of the problems that arise when trial design is not sound. We then evaluate the available evidence for the use of foot orthoses, with particular focus on published randomized controlled trials. From the evidence to date, it seems that foot orthoses do have a role in the management of plantar fasciitis and that prefabricated orthoses are a worthwhile initial management strategy. At this time, however, it is not possible to recommend either prefabricated or customized orthoses as being better, and it cannot be inferred that customized orthoses are more effective over time and therefore have a cost advantage. Additional good-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to answer these questions. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 94(6): 542–549, 2004)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
L. C. Trotter and M. R. Pierrynowski
Changes in Gait Economy Between Full-Contact Custom-made Foot Orthoses and Prefabricated Inserts in Patients with Musculoskeletal Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, November 1, 2008; 98(6): 429 - 435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Arch Intern MedHome page
K. B. Landorf, A.-M. Keenan, and R. D. Herbert
Effectiveness of foot orthoses to treat plantar fasciitis: a randomized trial.
Arch Intern Med, June 26, 2006; 166(12): 1305 - 1310.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
K. B. Landorf
Letter to the editor: cimetidine as a first-line therapy for pedal verruca.
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, March 1, 2006; 96(2): 184 - 185.
[Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2004 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.