JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McPoil, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cornwall, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McPoil, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cornwall, M. W.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume 95 Number 2 114-120 2005
Copyright © 2005 American Podiatric Medical Association

Use of the Longitudinal Arch Angle to Predict Dynamic Foot Posture in Walking

Thomas G. McPoil, PhD, PT, ATC * and Mark W. Cornwall, PhD, PT, CPed *

* Department of Physical Therapy, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.

Corresponding author: Thomas G. McPoil, PhD, PT, ATC, Department of Physical Therapy, Northern Arizona University, PO Box 15105, Flagstaff, AZ 86011.

Abstract

To determine whether differences exist in the longitudinal arch angle based on sex or extremity, the longitudinal arch angle was assessed in 21 men and 21 women using a digital image of the medial aspect of each subject’s feet. The image was obtained with the subject in relaxed standing posture and in maximum internal rotation of the lower leg. To determine whether the longitudinal arch angle could be used to predict dynamic foot posture during walking, 50 different subjects were asked to walk across a 6-m walkway while the medial aspect of each foot was videotaped. The longitudinal arch angle was digitized from digital images obtained at midstance for three walking trials. No differences in the longitudinal arch angle were found based on sex or extremity. The longitudinal arch angles obtained in the static positions of relaxed standing posture and maximum internal rotation were highly predictive of dynamic foot posture at midstance during walking. Relaxed standing posture and maximum internal rotation significantly contributed to explaining more than 90% of the variance associated with the longitudinal arch angle position at midstance during walking. These results validate use of the longitudinal arch angle as part of the foot and ankle physical examination. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95(2): 114–120, 2005)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
J. L. Tweed, S. J. Avil, J. A. Campbell, and M. R. Barnes
Etiologic Factors in the Development of Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome: A Review of the Literature
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, March 1, 2008; 98(2): 107 - 111.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
T. G. McPoil and M. W. Cornwall
Prediction of Dynamic Foot Posture During Running Using the Longitudinal Arch Angle
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, March 1, 2007; 97(2): 102 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Podiatr. Med. Assoc.Home page
M. M. Franettovich, T. G. McPoil, T. Russell, G. Skardoon, and B. Vicenzino
The Ability to Predict Dynamic Foot Posture from Static Measurements
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, March 1, 2007; 97(2): 115 - 120.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.