JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Igbigbi, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Shariff, M. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Igbigbi, P. S.
Right arrow Articles by Shariff, M. B.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume 95 Number 3 273-276 2005
Copyright © 2005 American Podiatric Medical Association

Arch Index as a Predictor of Pes Planus

A Comparative Study of Indigenous Kenyans and Tanzanians

Patrick S. Igbigbi, MBBS, MSc *, Boniface C. Msamati, MD, PhD * and Macfenton B. Shariff, BSc *

* Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Blantyre.

Corresponding author: Patrick S. Igbigbi, MBBS, MSc, Department of Anatomy, College of Medicine, University of Malawi, Private Bag 360, Chichiri, Blantyre 3, Malawi.

Abstract

We determined the arch index of able-bodied indigenous Kenyan and Tanzanian individuals free of foot pain by using their dynamic footprints to classify the foot arch type and determine the prevalence of pes planus according to a previously described method. Males had a significantly higher arch index than females in both groups, and the prevalence of pes planus in Kenyans was 432 per 1,000 population, the highest ever documented and twice as high as that in Tanzanians (203 per 1,000 population). The arch index is useful in determining the prevalence of pes planus and possibly predicting pathologic foot conditions, and it may serve as an early warning sign of structural and functional defects of the foot in a given population. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95(3): 273–276, 2005)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2005 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.