JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dixon, S. J.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume 96 Number 4 305-312 2006
Copyright © 2006 American Podiatric Medical Association

Application of Center-of-Pressure Data to Indicate Rearfoot Inversion-Eversion in Shod Running

Sharon J. Dixon, PhD *

* School of Sport and Health Sciences, St. Luke’s Campus, University of Exeter, Heavitree Rd, Exeter EX1 2LU, England.

Abstract

Although pressure plates are used to help in the selection of appropriate footwear for runners, evidence relating aspects of pressure data to movement is lacking. A study was conducted to investigate whether center-of-pressure (COP) data obtained for shod running could be used to indicate the amount of rearfoot eversion. It was hypothesized that subjects exhibiting high rearfoot eversion during the initial ground contact phase of running would also show a large lateral-to-medial deviation in the COP. Pressure plate and rearfoot movement data were collected for 33 subjects. The COP was characterized using the lateral-to-medial deviation of the COP during the eversion phase of ground contact. Correlation coefficients were determined for COP deviation versus rearfoot range of motion and versus peak rearfoot eversion (P < .05). In addition, subjects were grouped as high, moderate, or low pronators, and analysis of variance was used to test whether there were significant differences in COP deviation for these three groups (P < .05). The COP deviation was found to have a low correlation with rearfoot range of motion (R = 0.46; P < .05) and with peak rearfoot eversion (R = .54; P < .05). High pronators had significantly higher COP deviation than the medium- and low-pronation groups (P < .05). These findings support the use of COP deviation to detect high pronation. However, caution is advised in using the COP to indicate absolute rearfoot eversion. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 96(4): 305–312, 2006)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.