JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McPoil, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cornwall, M. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McPoil, T. G.
Right arrow Articles by Cornwall, M. W.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume 97 Number 2 102-107 2007
Copyright © 2007 American Podiatric Medical Association

Prediction of Dynamic Foot Posture During Running Using the Longitudinal Arch Angle

Thomas G. McPoil, PhD, PT, ATC * and Mark W. Cornwall, PhD, PT, CPed *

* Department of Physical Therapy, Gait Research Laboratory, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff.

Corresponding author: Thomas G. McPoil, PhD, PT, CPed, Department of Physical Therapy, Gait Research Laboratory, Northern Arizona University, Box 15105, Flagstaff, AZ 86011.

Abstract

Background: A study was conducted to determine whether the longitudinal arch angle can be used to predict dynamic foot posture during running.

Methods: Seventeen healthy, experienced runners participated in the study. The static longitudinal arch angle was determined from a digital image of the medial aspect of each subject’s feet obtained in relaxed standing posture. For the dynamic phase, subjects were asked to walk across a 12-m walkway and then to run across a 25-m runway while the medial aspect of each foot was videotaped. The longitudinal arch angle was digitized from the video images at midstance in walking and at midsupport while running for five trials per extremity.

Results: The longitudinal arch angle obtained in relaxed standing posture was highly predictive of dynamic foot posture at midstance in walking (r2 = 0.854) and at midsupport while running (r2 = 0.846).

Conclusions: The static measurement of longitudinal arch angle is highly predictive of dynamic foot posture during walking and running. The longitudinal arch angle measured in relaxed standing posture significantly contributed to explaining more than 85% of the variance associated with the longitudinal arch angle position at midstance during walking and at midsupport while running. These results seem to validate use of the longitudinal arch angle as part of the foot and ankle physical examination. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 97(2): 102–107, 2007)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.