JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Allison, G. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Allison, G. T.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume 97 Number 2 165-170 2007
Copyright © 2007 American Podiatric Medical Association

Statistical and Clinical Interpretation of Research Results

Garry T. Allison, PhD *

* School of Surgery and Pathology, Centre for Musculoskeletal Studies, Level 2 MRF Bldg, Rear 50 Murray St, Perth, Western Australia 6014, Australia.

Abstract

There is a well-known phenomenon of publication bias toward manuscripts that report statistically significant differences. The clinical implications of these statistically significant differences are not always clear because the magnitude of the changes may be clinically meaningless. This article relates the critical P value threshold to the magnitude of the actual observed change and provides a rationale for reporting confidence intervals in clinical studies. Strategies for improving statistical power and reducing the magnitude of the confidence interval range for clinical trials are also described. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 97(2): 165–170, 2007)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2007 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.