JAPMA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, P.
Right arrow Articles by Stuessi, E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wolf, P.
Right arrow Articles by Stuessi, E.
Journal of the American Podiatric Medical Association
Volume 98 Number 1 45-50 2008
Copyright © 2008 American Podiatric Medical Association

Transmissions Within the Tarsal Gearbox

Peter Wolf, PhD *, Alex Stacoff, PhD *, Roger Luechinger, PhD {dagger}, Peter Boesiger, PhD {dagger} and Edgar Stuessi, PhD *

* Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Dr. Wolf is now with Sensory-Motor Systems Laboratory, ETH Zurich and with the University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
{dagger} Institute for Biomedical Engineering, University and ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Corresponding author: Peter Wolf, PhD, Sensory-Motor Systems Laboratory, ETH Zurich and University of Zurich, Tannenstrasse 1, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland. (E-mail: pwolf{at}ethz.ch)

Abstract

Background: The dependence of the movements of the calcaneus, cuboid, navicular, and talus on each other have been described as the tarsal gearbox. To provide a basis of its modeling, data on transmissions between tarsal joint rotations within this gearbox are required. The feasibility of tibiocalcaneal rotations to predict tarsal joint rotations is of interest because a meaningful relation would allow the use of common motion analysis with skin markers to investigate rearfoot kinematics.

Methods: We performed linear regression analyses between tarsal joint and tibiocalcaneal rotations on the basis of magnetic resonance imaging of tibia and tarsal bone positions during quasi-static foot pronation and supination.

Results: In the frontal plane and transverse planes, linear models were found to predict tarsal joint rotations quite well (r2 = 0.83–0.97 for the frontal plane and r2 = 0.73–0.95 for the transverse plane). For each degree of talocalcaneal rotation, there was 1.8° of talonavicular rotation in the frontal plane and 1.6° in the transverse plane; each degree of talocalcaneal rotation resulted in 0.6° of calcanealcuboid rotation in the frontal plane and 0.7° in the transverse plane; each degree of calcaneocuboid rotation resulted in 3° of talonavicular rotation in the frontal plane and 2.8° in the transverse; each degree of tibiocalcaneal rotation resulted in 0.9° of talocalcaneal rotation in the frontal plane and 0.9° in the transverse plane; and each degree of tibiocalcaneal rotation resulted in 1.6° of talonavicular rotation in the frontal plane and 1.3° in the transverse plane.

Conclusion: The present study provides a basis on which the tarsal gearbox in the frontal and the transverse planes under quasi-static conditions can be modeled. Furthermore, it is concluded that tibiocalcaneal rotations are practical for predicting tarsal joint rotations during quasi-static motions. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 98(1): 45–50, 2008)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by the American Podiatric Medical Association.