This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dogan, A. Articles by Gokalp, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dogan, A. Articles by Gokalp, M. A.

Biomechanical Comparison of Achilles Tenotomy and Achilloplasty Techniques in Young Rats

An Experimental Study

Ali Dogan, MD ^*, Mahmut Korkmaz, BS , Nurettin Cengiz, MD , A. Murat Kalender, MD ^* and M. Ata Gokalp, MD ^*

^* Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, School of Medicine, Yuzuncu Yil University, Van, Turkey.
Department of Textile, Mustafa Cikrikcioglu School of Higher Education, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.
Department of Histology, Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Medicine, Van, Turkey.

Corresponding author: Ali Dogan, MD, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medicine Faculty of Yuzuncu Yil University, Kazim Karabekir St, Van, Turkey 65100. (E-mail: alidogan67{at}hotmail.com)

Abstract

Background: Tendo Achillis lengthening is performed by means of Z-plasty in the classic treatment of clubfoot. In the Ponseti method for treating clubfoot, Achilles tenotomy is performed percutaneously for residual equine deformity. A randomized study was designed to compare tendon healing after tenotomy versus Z-plasty.

Methods: Thirty-six Sprague-Dawley rats were divided randomly into two groups. On the first day, while the right tendo Achillis of group 1 rats underwent tenotomy, those of group 2 rats underwent Z-plasty. Nine rats from each group were humanely killed on days 21 and 45 postoperatively. The two groups were compared with each other biomechanically and histologically. The Achilles tendons of eight rats in each group were evaluated biomechanically, and the remaining rat in each group underwent histologic evaluation.

Results: Mean ± SD maximum load at rupture of the treated tendons on days 21 and 45 in the tenotomy group was 26.38 ± 7.31 N and 47.16 ± 15.36 N, respectively, and in the Z-plasty group was 27.37 ± 5.20 N and 45.27 ± 9.59 N, respectively. The biomechanical evaluation revealed no significant difference in terms of breaking forces between the two groups. The difference between breaking forces on days 21 and 45 was statistically significant for both groups.

Conclusions: Tendons in the tenotomy group healed as well as those in the Z-plasty group, and Achilles tenotomy in the rat was similar to Z-plasty for Achilles tendon lengthening. Human correlation may or may not exist, but this study suggests that it should be considered and investigated. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 99(3): 216–222, 2009)